General Relativity

General Relativity

General Theory of Relativity is a theory of gravitation that was developed by Albert Einstein in the year 1915. It describes gravity not as a force, but as a curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of mass and energy. The theory has been confirmed by numerous experiments and observations, and has become a cornerstone of modern physics. In this section, we will explore some of the key concepts and phenomena related to general relativity, including orbits in curved spacetime, gravitational waves, and the precession of apsis.

🏔️

Albert Einstein (1879-1955) was a German-born theoretical physicist who developed the theory of relativity, one of the two pillars of modern physics (alongside quantum mechanics). He is best known for his mass-energy equivalence formula E=mc2E=mc^2, which has been dubbed “the world’s most famous equation”. Einstein’s work has had a profound impact on our understanding of the universe, and he is widely regarded as one of the greatest scientists in history.

Aside from the theory of special and general relativity, Einstein made significant contributions to the development of quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, and cosmology. He received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921 for his explanation of the photoelectric effect, which was a key step in the development of quantum theory. Einstein’s legacy continues to influence physics and our understanding of the universe to this day.

👀

The four tests of general relativity are:

  1. The perihelion precession of Mercury’s orbit
  2. The deflection of light by the Sun
  3. The gravitational redshift of light
  4. The Shapiro time delay of light passing near a massive object

The test for the deflection of light by the Sun was first performed during a solar eclipse in 1919 by Sir Arthur Eddington, and provided one of the first pieces of evidence in support of general relativity. The other tests have also been confirmed by various experiments and observations over the years, further solidifying the theory’s status as a cornerstone of modern physics.

Orbits in General Relativity

Orbits in general relativity are more complex than those in Newtonian mechanics due to the curvature of spacetime. The equations governing the motion of bodies in a gravitational field are derived from Einstein’s field equations, which relate the curvature of spacetime to the energy and momentum of matter and radiation. Here, we shall explore the properties of orbits in general relativity, including the existence of stable and unstable circular orbits.

Consider a system of a massive central mass MM being orbited by a smaller mass mm, such that the central body is essentially at rest. The energy analogue in general relativity is given by

12r˙2+h22r2GMrGMh2c2r3=ϵ \frac{1}{2} \dot{r}^2 + \frac{h^2}{2r^2} - \frac{GM}{r} - \frac{GMh^2}{c^2 r^3} = \epsilon

Here ϵ\epsilon is a term related to the energy of the system, and hh is the specific angular momentum of the orbiting body.

📍

The above equation is derived from the Schwarzschild metric, which describes the spacetime geometry around a non-rotating, spherically symmetric mass. The additional term GMh2c2r3-\frac{GMh^2}{c^2 r^3} compared to the Newtonian case arises due to the curvature of spacetime and leads to significant differences in the behavior of orbits, especially near massive bodies like black holes.

The Schwarzschild metric was the first exact solution to Einstein’s field equations, found by Karl Schwarzschild in 1916. It is given by

ds2=(1rsr)c2dt2+(1rsr)1dr2+r2dΩ2 ds^2 = -\left( 1 - \frac{r_s}{r} \right) c^2 dt^2 + \left( 1 - \frac{r_s}{r} \right)^{-1} dr^2 + r^2 d\Omega^2

where dΩ2d\Omega^2 is the metric on the unit sphere. The Schwarzschild radius rs=2GMc2r_s = \frac{2GM}{c^2} is a critical radius at which the escape velocity equals the speed of light, and it defines the event horizon of a black hole.

We shall talk more about metrics when discussing cosmology.

For a circular orbit, r˙=0\dot{r} = 0, which gives the radius of the orbit as

r=h22GM[1±112G2M2c2h2](3.7.9)\tag{3.7.9} r = \frac{h^2}{2GM} \left[ 1 \pm \sqrt{1 -\frac{12G^2M^2}{c^2h^2}} \right]

We see that for a given angular momentum hh, two circular orbits are possible. Introducing a=h/ca = h/c and the schwarschild radius rs=2GMc2r_s = \frac{2GM}{c^2},

r=a2rs(1±13rs2a2) r = \frac{a^2}{r_s} \left( 1 \pm \sqrt{1 - \frac{3r_s^2}{a^2}} \right)

Therefore for a circular orbit, a>3rsa > \sqrt{3} r_s. This puts a limit on the minimum angular momentum of the body (hmin=3rsch_\text{min} = \sqrt{3} r_s c).

The inner orbit

rinner=a2rs(113rs2a2) r_\text{inner} = \frac{a^2}{r_s} \left( 1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{3r_s^2}{a^2}} \right)

is unstable, while the outer orbit

router=a2rs(1+13rs2a2) r_\text{outer} = \frac{a^2}{r_s} \left( 1 + \sqrt{1 - \frac{3r_s^2}{a^2}} \right)

is stable. The stability of the orbits can be determined by analyzing the second derivative of the effective potential, which shows that the inner orbit corresponds to a local maximum (unstable) and the outer orbit corresponds to a local minimum (stable).

Therefore the minimum radius of a stable circular orbit is when a2=3rs2a^2 = 3r_s^2

r=a2rs=3rs=6GMc2(3.7.10)\tag{3.7.10} r = \frac{a^2}{r_s} = 3r_s = \frac{6GM}{c^2}

An orbit at this radius is known as the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO). This means that for a non-rotating black hole, any matter that comes within this radius will inevitably spiral into the black hole, while matter outside this radius can potentially form an accretion disk and emit radiation. The ISCO is an important concept in astrophysics, as it determines the inner edge of the accretion disk around a black hole and has implications for the emission of X-rays and other high-energy radiation from the vicinity of black holes.

👀
A very interesting consequence of the existence of the ISCO is that it leads to a maximum possible efficiency for energy extraction from accretion onto a black hole. For a non-rotating black hole, the maximum efficiency is about 6%, meaning that up to 6% of the rest mass energy of the infalling matter can be converted into radiation. For rotating black holes, the efficiency can be much higher, up to about 42% for a maximally rotating Kerr black hole.

In the limit arsa \gg r_s,

router=2a2rs=h2GM,rinner=32rs=3GMc2(3.7.11)\tag{3.7.11} r_\text{outer} = \frac{2a^2}{r_s} = \frac{h^2}{GM}\,,\qquad\qquad r_\text{inner} = \frac{3}{2} r_s = \frac{3GM}{c^2}

From the equation, we see that circular orbits with radius smaller than 32rs\frac{3}{2} r_s are not possible. An object that has crossed this boundary can still escape the black hole if it has enough energy, but it cannot maintain a stable orbit. It must accelerate to escape, and if it fails to do so, it will eventually spiral into the black hole.

Moreover, the orbit with radius 32rs\frac{3}{2} r_s is known as the photon sphere, and it represents the closest distance at which light can orbit a massive body in a circular path (in fact, this is the only circular orbit possible for massless particles). This is an unstable orbit, and any perturbation will cause the photon to either fall into the black hole or escape to infinity. The photon sphere is a unique feature of the spacetime around a black hole and has important implications for the behavior of light and the appearance of black holes.

📍
The existence of the photon sphere also leads to interesting phenomena such as gravitational lensing, where light from a background source can be bent around a massive object, creating multiple images or even a ring-like structure known as an Einstein ring. This will be discussed in more detail later.

Precession of apsis in General Relativity

It was noted in the mid-19th century by Urbain Le Verrier that the apsis of Mercury’s orbit precesses at a rate of 4343 arcseconds per century, which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. This was one of the first pieces of evidence for general relativity, which could explain this anomalous precession. We shall show how to calculate this precession using two methods: the precession of the LRL vector, and using the orbit equation in general relativity.

👀
A similar deviation from predicted orbit was first observed in the orbit of Uranus, which led to the discovery of Neptune, and then also led to the discovery of Pluto. A similar explanation for the precession of Mercury’s orbit was proposed by Le Verrier, which involved the existence of an intra-Mercurial planet named Vulcan. However, no such planet was ever observed, and the explanation was eventually discarded in favor of general relativity.
Precession of apsis in General Relativity
The apsis of the orbit precesses over time if considering effects of general relativity. (Source: Wikipedia)

Precession of LRL vector under a perturbed potential

Consider a small perturbation h(r)h(r) to the potential energy V(r)V(r), such that

V(r)=kr+h(r) V(r) = -\frac{k}{r} + h(r)

Since the force is no longer inverse-square, the LRL vector is no longer conserved, and precesses, leading to precessing of apsis.

dAdt=dh(r)dtr^×L=Lddth(r)φ^ \frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt} = - \frac{d h(r)}{dt} \, \hat{\mathbf{r}} \times \mathbf{L} = L \frac{d}{dt} h(r) \: \hat{\mathbf{\varphi}}

Since L\mathbf{L} and EE are still conserved, the magnitude of A\mathbf{A} remains constant. Writing L=mr2θ˙L = mr^2 \dot{\theta},

dAdθ=mdduh(u)φ^ \frac{d \mathbf{A}}{d \theta} = -m \frac{d}{du} h(u) \hat{\mathbf{\varphi}}

where u=1/ru = 1/r. The average precession of the apsis

ΔφΔAA=mA02πdduh(u)dθ \Delta \varphi \approx \frac{|\Delta \mathbf{A}|}{A} = \frac{m}{A} \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{d}{du} h(u) d \theta

The rate of precession is therefore given by

φ˙=mAT02πdduh(u)dθ(3.7.4)\tag{3.7.4} \dot{\varphi} = \frac{m}{AT} \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{d}{du} h(u) d \theta

If the perturbation is small, the orbit during one revolution can be approximated as Keplerian

u=mkL2[1+Amkcosθ] u = \frac{mk}{L^2} \left[ 1 + \frac{A}{mk} \cos \theta \right]

and hence the integral can be evaluated.

For example, the potential due to a point mass in general relativity is given by

V(r)=GMmrGML2mc2r3(3.7.5)\tag{3.7.5} V(r) = - \frac{GMm}{r} - \frac{GML^2}{mc^2r^3}

Evaluating the integral gives

Δφ=6πG2M2m2c2L2(3.7.6)\tag{3.7.6} \Delta \varphi = \frac{6 \pi G^2M^2m^2}{c^2L^2}

Using the orbit equation

The orbit equation in general relativity is given by

d2udθ2+u=GMm2L2+3GMc2u2 \frac{d^2 u}{d \theta^2} + u = \frac{GMm^2}{L^2} + \frac{3GM}{c^2} u^2

Defining a dimensionless w=L2GMm2uw = \frac{L^2}{GMm^2} u and α=2G2M2m2c2L2(1)\alpha = \frac{2G^2M^2m^2}{c^2L^2} \:\: (\ll 1),

d2wdθ2+w=1+αw2 \frac{d^2 w}{d \theta^2} + w = 1 + \alpha w^2

Since α\alpha is very small, we can use perturbation methods to find an approximate solution for ww. In the first order, w(α)w (\alpha) can be expanded in terms of a power series as

w=w0+αw1 w = w_0 + \alpha w_1

w0w_0 just gives the newtonian solution

d2w0dθ2+w0=1    w0=1+ecosθ \frac{d^2 w_0}{d \theta^2} + w_0 = 1 \implies w_0 = 1 + e \cos \theta

For w1w_1, we get

d2w1dθ2+w1w02=1+e22+2ecosθ+e22cos2θ \frac{d^2 w_1}{d \theta^2} + w_1 \approx w_0^2 = 1 + \frac{e^2}{2} + 2 e \cos \theta +\frac{e^2}{2} \cos 2 \theta

This gives the solution for w1w_1 as

w1=1+e22+eθsinθe26cos2θ w_1 = 1 + \frac{e^2}{2} + e \theta \sin \theta - \frac{e^2}{6} \cos 2 \theta

Putting everything together and neglecting the small terms, we get

w1+ecos[(1α)θ] w \approx 1 + e \cos \left[ (1 - \alpha) \, \theta \right]

The period of the ellipse is not 2π2 \pi, and hence precesses at a rate of

Δφ=2π2π1α2πα=6πG2M2m2c2L2 \Delta \varphi = 2\pi - \frac{2 \pi}{1 - \alpha} \approx 2\pi \alpha = \frac{6\pi G^2 M^2 m^2}{c^2L^2}

which matches the result which we obtained via the precession of the LRL vector.

Gravitational Waves

Gravitational waves are waves of spacetime curvature that propagate at the speed of light and are produced by the relative motion of gravitating masses. They were predicted by Einstein in 1916 as a consequence of his general theory of relativity, and were first directly detected by the LIGO and Virgo collaborations in 2015. The sources of gravitational waves include binary systems of compact objects (like black holes and neutron stars), supernovae, and the early universe.

👀
The first evidence of gravitational waves came from the observation of the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar in 1974, which showed that the orbit of the pulsar was decaying at a rate consistent with the emission of gravitational waves. This discovery earned Hulse and Taylor the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1993. The direct detection of gravitational waves by LIGO in 2015 was a groundbreaking achievement that confirmed a major prediction of general relativity and opened up a new era of gravitational wave astronomy.

Consider two massive bodies M1M_1 and M2M_2 orbiting each other, with position vectors r1\mathbf{r_1} and r2\mathbf{r_2} relative to the center of mass. We define M=M1+M2M = M_1 + M_2 and m=M1M2M1+M2m = \frac{M_1 M_2}{M_1 + M_2}.

According to general theory of relativity, accelerated masses with non zero quadrupole moments radiate gravitational waves (GWs) and lose energy. For small enough velocities, the emitted GWs

  • have a frequency twice as large as the orbital frequency
  • can be characterized by a luminosity, which is dominated by the expression
P=325Gc5m2a4Ω6(3.7.12)\tag{3.7.12} P = \frac{32}{5} \frac{G}{c^5}m^2 a^4 \Omega^6

where aa is the orbital separation and Ω\Omega is the angular velocity of each mass.

The energy of the system is E=GMm2aE = - \frac{GMm}{2a}. Differentiating, we get

(dΩdt)3=(965)3Ω11c5(GMc)5(3.7.13)\tag{3.7.13} \left( \frac{d \Omega}{dt} \right)^3 = \left( \frac{96}{5} \right)^3 \frac{\Omega^{11}}{c^5} (GM_c)^5

where we define the chirp mass Mc=m3/5M2/5M_c = m^{3/5} M^{2/5}.

Now, fGW=2f=Ωπf_\text{GW} = 2f = \frac{\Omega}{\pi} gives

fGW8/3(t)=(8π)8/35(GMcc3)5/3(t0t)(3.7.14)\tag{3.7.14} f_\text{GW}^{-8/3} (t) = \frac{(8 \pi)^{8/3}}{5} \left( \frac{GM_c}{c^3} \right)^{5/3} (t_0 - t)

where t0t_0 is a constant of integration.

Problem. This problem asks you to calculate the power of the GW150914 gravitational wave (the first gravitational wave detected by LIGO) and thus estimate the sizes and masses of the objects that produced it.